![]() |
Health Outcomes Communicator Great communication ideas for healthcare economists Issue 5 – June 2006 | ||||
Welcome to our June issue of HOC
Meanwhile, your editor dashed in and out of the three plenary sessions, 68 podiums, 32 workshops, and eight issues panels, while viewing most of the 457 posters (Roche won two awards for Rx-produced posters), and visiting the scores of exhibitors. Now that the frenzy is over we can turn to the June issue of Health Outcomes Communicator, which, you'll notice, has a slightly altered tagline to reflect HOC's even stronger focus on communications issues. So you'll find Amy Schonfeld explaining how to zero-in on those journals that best communicate health economics in an upbeat and proactive manner. And, in addition to the Watch Your Language series, we offer several brief pieces on making the most of conferences and email communication.
|
|||||
"We have a habit in writing articles published in scientific journals to make the work as finished as possible, to cover up all the tracks, to not worry about the blind alleys or describe how you had the wrong idea first, and so on. So there isn't any place to publish, in a dignified manner, what you actually did in order to do the work."
Finding those journals with a positive interest in health economics by Amy Rothman Schonfeld Print journals remain one of the most credible sources for disseminating health economic research findings, and there is consensus about which are the core publications for communications within the field. At least some health economists are stepping out of their “health economics shell” and looking beyond these traditional research outlets to other venues – whether speciality or general-interest medical publications or the general news media – to reach wider audiences. Health Economics and the Journal of Health Economics are considered the premier journals for communicating with fellow health economists, according to Kevin Frick, PhD, an associate professor in the department of Health Policy Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Entries to these journals tend to be highly specialised and technical, and include empirical studies and theoretical contributions that focus on manpower planning and forecasting, financing of health services, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses of procedures and treatments, and budgeting issues. In 2004, the ISI (Journal Citation Report Impact Factor)* was 2.495 for the Journal of Health Economics and 1.591 for Health Economics. Three other journals are also highly regarded within the health economic field but have a broader readership: Medical Decision Making, Pharmacoeconomics, and Value in Health , according to Dr. Frick. The Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy and the American Journal of Managed Care are appropriate for economic valuations of medications and formulary decision making. There is a growing appreciation within the health economic community that it is imperative to reach out to other audiences. “There's a concern that journals like Health Economics and the Journal of Health Economics are not being read by managed care medical directors or other leaders that are making decisions about health care dollars,” Jennifer Lofland, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Research Assistant Professor of Medicine, and Project Director, Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, told us. She suggests that authors should look to publications that focus on treating specific clinical diseases, especially those with wide readership like the Archives of Internal Medicine or the Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Frick adds JAMA to this list. “In my mind, JAMA has the distinction of being one of the few journals that is not an economics journal but holds authors of cost/effectiveness articles to some very high standards in terms of what needs to be in an article in order to be accepted – but makes it very easy and transparent for readers to understand what is being presented.” Frick strongly believes that reaching out and educating other health professionals is an essential part of the professional responsibilities of a health economist. He suggests that colleagues should volunteer to serve on the editorial board of journals outside their speciality and review articles for publications if asked. “There must be a willingness among health economists to do the reviews, even if it's not a journal they would pick up themselves,” says Frick. “If we're not willing to participate in that quality control which extends beyond our immediate profession, there are going to be bad articles published.” Lofland has been noticing recently that health economic reporting is appearing in mainstream venues, although she knows of only a handful of health economists who seek those outlets. “If we could have more of that [type of exposure], that would be even better, because my impression is that more people read the Wall Street Journal than read the Journal of Health Economics.” * The Journal Citation Report Impact Factor or ISI is a quantitative measure of the frequency with which the average article published in a given scientific journal has been cited in a particular year or period , and is generally considered to be a measure of the importance of a scientific journal. As a rule of thumb, an impact factor above 1.5 is fairly respectable. Many journals don't have impact factors at all – and the creme de la creme can be above 30 e.g. the New England Journal of Medicine. JAMA impact factor is over 21, Archives of internal Medicine is over 6; you can generally find these figures from the journal websites or the ISI Journal citation reports for the previous year. http://scientific.thomson.com/products/jcr
How to make the most of conferences Conference attendance can be a big part of your travel budget, and with these being limited at times, it's important to make the most of the opportunity. Here we list a few pointers to help you focus.
Tips for communicating with email Email is a wonderful invention, but can also be the bane of your life if you become a slave to it. Striking a happy balance is difficult, but here are a few practices that might help. When sending email:
If you are receiving email:
"The problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred." Effective communication Creating posters that get your message across by Clare Gurton Getting your poster seen and read at an international or national conference can be something of a lottery – the space and location are decided for you and you may have only a few minutes in which to get your message across. The audience is bombarded with hundreds of different messages during the course of the meeting and cannot hope to remember everything. While it is helpful to provide poster handouts, your poster must be competitive to succeed. Two things are crucially important:
The poster needs to be designed so that this message is highlighted by use of colour, bold fonts and enlarged point sizes. Similarly, your name (or that of the first author) should be very visible and easy to read and remember. In this way, those who are interested in your data will retain the message and copy a name. When they return home after the meeting they are then easily able to get hold of all the other information either from the abstract book or by making contact. "The skill of writing is to create a context in which other people can think. "
Troublesome triads
Singular or plural verb – do you know the answer?
A number (a total) takes a plural verb. The number (the total) takes a singular verb.
When none means not any, a plural verb is preferable. When none specifically means not one, a singular verb is preferable. Therefore: 1, have; 2, is. Thanks to Edith Schwager, author of Medical English Usage and Abusage, Greenwood Publishing Group/Oryx Press.
As we are now on our fifth issue of HOC, and our mailing list is expanding rapidly, we would greatly welcome some early feedback on how you view the newsletter and the value of its content by selecting one of the following links: Click positive feedback if you find HOC's content relevant and interesting, the overall image professional and well designed, and you are happy with the monthly frequency. Click average feedback if you find the content of some interest, the overall presentation satisfactory or you would prefer to receive fortnightly. Click negative feedback if HOC's content serves no purpose, its image needs improving or you would prefer not to receive it. If you would like to add any comments on your return email, we would be interested in your views on:
We will publish all results and feedback anonymously in a future issue. Thank you for your input.
Another packed issue, including making effective presentations at conferences, reading to keep up to date, and improving your listening skills. HOC is your publication, so please send us your requests or comments. Just email to chris.gardiner@rxcomms.com.
We now have pdf versions available so you can print out a handy 4-page newsletter to keep. If you have missed any of our earlier issues, email chris.gardiner@rxcomms.com for a copy.
Healthcare Outcomes Communicator is designed to help you explain and enhance your role and value as healthcare economists and outcomes researchers. But we need input from you – the professionals working "in the trenches". So we encourage you to give us your feedback about how we're doing – to communicate with us so that we can better communicate with you. Yours sincerely This material is published in good faith and is subject to editorial scrutiny before publication, however no warranty or guarantee of its accuracy is expressed or implied. No liability will be accepted by Rx Communications for any loss resulting from use of this resource. Produced by Beaumore Publishing Solutions |
|||||