HEOR & RWE Writing for Pharma & Biotech
Real-world evidence narratives and health economics writing that turns complex outcomes data into clear, defensible value communications. Delivered by senior specialists backed by 25+ years’ experience, 3,985 projects, and 2,700+ publications.
Quick response, zero obligation. NDA available
Why teams use us for HEOR and RWE writing
We translate real-world evidence into a coherent story with clear context, limitations, and defensible interpretation — designed to stand up under review.
Health economics expertise that reads clearly
From cost-effectiveness and budget impact to HTA-focused writing, we help teams communicate economic value without losing technical integrity.
Value communications, not just summaries
We create value dossiers and other value-focused outputs tailored to stakeholder needs (including payers, healthcare providers and patients), with the option of more interactive presentation where useful.
Governance-ready delivery across reviewers
A dedicated PM manages timelines, routing and version control so cross-functional reviews stay controlled and the output is straightforward to approve and re-use.
4,000+ projects delivered since 1997
25 years supporting publications-led programmes
50+ senior scientific writers across major therapy areas
What clients say
The manuscript is officially accepted. I have truly enjoyed collaborating with you.
Publications Lead
Oncology
We finally get our manuscript accepted. Thanks to all of you, and especially Emma, for all your excellent inputs and efforts. It was a great pleasure for me to work with you on this manuscript.
Chief Medical Officer Lead
Diabetes
The chart looks Fantastic! You guys have the most creative ideas. I remember at ISPOR, your booth had a very creative contest. Thank you very much for that.
Anon
Anon
Great work! You could provide finally a good comprehensive manuscript full of data despite the difficulties in the interpretation of results and the extra analysis you had to do.
International Scientific Communications
Not Specified
Tell us your congress and deadline, we’ll outline next steps
GPP 2022 / ICMJE aligned • Works in Datavision, Vault & iEnvision • NDA same-day
4,000+ Projects Since 1997
25yrs Delivering Publications
50+ Writers Across Therapeutic Areas
How we deliver HEOR and RWE writing that’s ready to use
Teams choose us because our delivery is predictable, structured, and stress-free — even for complex publications.
Kick-off & briefing
Congress, criteria, objectives, data availability and key messages
Writer matching
Senior writer aligned to therapy area and deliverable type
Draft Development
Clear, defensible scientific writing delivered to timeline
Structured reviews
Predictable windows, tracked comments, controlled routing
Final QC
Accuracy, references, consistency, compliance alignment, submission-ready outputs packaged to your workflow and templates
Secure our next available writing slot
NDA same-day • No commitment • Fast start options available
4,000+ projects delivered since 1997
25 years delivering publications
50+ Writers across many therapeutic areas
Make outcomes evidence easier to approve and act on
We help you deliver documents that make your science clear, credible, and easy for reviewers to approve.
%20(1).webp)
Scientifically rigorous
Defensible interpretation that holds up under scrutiny from HEOR, medical, statistical and governance reviewers — with disciplined claims and clear limitations.
.webp)
Stakeholder-aligned
Written for value discussions and cross-functional alignment — so payers, medical affairs and internal governance teams can approve and act quickly.
Operationally smooth
Predictable timelines, controlled routing and cleaner review cycles — fewer escalations, fewer rewrites, and less last-minute pressure on your team.
Trusted by global pharma teams for 4,000+ projects since 1997.
Let’s explore if we’re the right fit
No pressure — just a clear conversation about your timelines, goals and project scope.
NDA available immediately • No commitment
Our Senior Writing Team
Senior scientific and medical writers, editors, and specialists matched to your therapeutic area and deliverable, so the work stays steady from briefing through to submission.
Quick response, zero obligation. NDA available
.webp)
Our approach: senior-led, carefully matched
When the data is complex and review cycles are demanding, continuity matters. This page exists to answer one simple question: who will actually do the writing and how do you ensure the work does not get passed down the chain.
What you can expect
- Senior writer-led delivery, with no unnecessary handovers
- Matching by therapy area and deliverable type
- Clear ownership from first draft through to finalisation
.webp)
How we match you with the right writer
- You share the deliverable and context (journal, congress, internal governance, evidence use)
- We match for fit (therapy area + document type + review environment)
- You get a clear recommended set-up (who we would put on it and how we would run it)
This keeps drafting stable and reduces late-stage rewrites caused by unclear ownership or mis-matched experience.
A small anonymised sample of our writers, editors, and specialists
Because of the nature of our work, some profiles are anonymised in public-facing materials. Where appropriate, we can share fuller detail later in the process.
*Not their real name
Senior oversight, close to the work
Alongside senior writers, our leadership team provides experienced oversight across scientific quality and publication delivery.
No items found.
Ready to bring in senior scientific writing support?
Share what you are working on and we will come back with a recommended set-up and next steps
NDA available immediately • No commitment
Therapy Area Experience
Scientific writing is easier to review when the writer already understands the science, the endpoints, and the clinical context. We draw on specialist experience across major therapeutic areas, and we match the right expertise to your deliverable and review environment.
Quick response, zero obligation. NDA available
Why therapeutic area experience matters
When your team is under pressure, the friction rarely comes from “writing”. It comes from interpretation, terminology, and clinical nuance, and from having to teach context repeatedly through the review cycle.
Therapy-area experience helps reduce that friction by:
- shortening onboarding (the writer recognises the patterns and language of the space)
- improving first-draft quality (fewer avoidable clarification loops)
- making reviews calmer (less time spent correcting scientific framing and context)
- keeping narratives consistent across related deliverables (abstract → poster → manuscript)
This is exactly why we match writers by therapy area + deliverable type, using a scalable network model and project oversight designed for controlled delivery.
.webp)
Coverage at a glance
Our therapeutic area coverage includes:
Central Nervous System • Cardiovascular • Dermatology • Gastrointestinal • Health Economics • Immunology • Infectious Diseases • Medical Devices • Men’s Health • Metabolic • Musculoskeletal • Oncology • Rare Diseases • Respiratory • Women’s Health
Depth where it counts: selected proof points
Because of the nature of our work all details remain anonymised in public-facing materials. Where appropriate, we can share fuller detail later in the process.
Metabolic
997 total projects | 764 publications | 168 custom projects.
997 total projects | 764 publications | 168 custom projects.
We have significant depth in metabolic and diabetes-related work, with delivery structured to protect quality and avoid conflicts. This is a mature capability area for RxComms; we take on work when the fit is right and capacity and firewalls allow.
Examples of depth in metabolic include:
- Running 150–200 diabetes projects annually for big pharma, carefully firewalled to avoid conflicts.
- 100+ journal publications written and reviewed.
- Almost 1,000 diabetes projects completed since 2005, giving strong pattern recognition across endpoints, settings, and evidence types.
- A specialist pool: 50+ medical writers with 10+ years’ experience in this therapeutic area.
Oncology
584 total projects | 393 publications | 129 custom projects
Oncology programmes move fast, review is exacting, and the consequences of a weak narrative are immediate. Our oncology experience covers publication-linked outputs as well as the “adjacent” scientific deliverables that often sit around them, helping teams keep evidence consistent from early congress work through to manuscript development. Examples of depth in oncology include:
- Global value dossiers supporting clinical and economic positioning.
- Strategic publications planning to sequence evidence and avoid last-minute rework.
- Clinical study reports with large numbers of SAE narratives, where accuracy and consistency are non-negotiable.
- Systematic literature reviews in breast and lung cancer.
- 300+ abstracts, posters, and original research outputs developed and published.
Immunology
645 total projects | 574 publications | 19 reviews
Immunology is crowded, technical, and constantly evolving. The value of experience here is in getting the mechanism, evidence, and positioning aligned early so the story holds together across deliverables and stakeholder groups. Examples of depth in immunology include:
- Original research articles and literature reviews, built to stand up to peer review.
- Strategic communications planning for immunology compounds, plus 200+ abstracts written and submitted.
- 200+ posters, 20+ original research articles, and support for KOL meetings when messaging and evidence need tight control.
- Slide sets for internal and external use, including interactive evidence summary formats.
Dermatology
477 total projects | 388 publications | 65 custom projects
Dermatology work spans a wide spectrum — from chronic disease to oncology-adjacent topics — and often requires clear handling of outcomes, patient experience, and practical clinical context. Experience helps keep the narrative grounded and “clinically readable” while still being scientifically rigorous.
Examples of depth in dermatology include:
- Long-standing continuity: 14 years with a wound care communications client and 6 years in psoriasis publications.
- Breadth across products and audiences, from wound care dressings to OTC-style dermatology needs, matched to the chosen channel.
- Deep psoriasis programme support, including 53 posters, abstracts, and podium presentations adapted for Spanish, German, Italian and English audiences to broaden European reach.
Breadth across adjacent and specialist areas
Not every programme needs hundreds of historical projects to be “specialist”. Sometimes what matters is the right specialist experience matched to the right deliverable. A few examples of breadth we support:
- Infectious Diseases: congress abstracts/posters, review article support, and multi-audience comms planning.
- Rare Diseases: examples include systematic literature reviews and specialist educational materials; rare disease work often relies on careful handling of small datasets and high-stakes interpretation.
- Medical Devices: experience includes value communications plans, competitor evaluations spanning large evidence sets, and clinical message training tools.
- Health Economics / HEOR-linked work: writer experience spans multiple therapy areas and includes HTA-related review work and value-focused deliverables.
- Gastrointestinal: 84 projects • 28 publications, including epidemiology work and scientific presentation development (e.g., NASH/NAFLD).
- Men’s Health: 68 projects • 38 publications, including congress outputs and publications support.
- Musculoskeletal: 116 projects • 57 publications, including advisory board outputs and publication-linked deliverables.
- Respiratory: 16 projects • 5 publications, including asthma/COPD data presentation training and specialist writer support.
- Women’s Health: publications and HEOR projects, including advisory board input and authored research outputs.
How we apply specialisation to your project
Therapeutic experience only helps if it shows up in the way the work is delivered. Our approach is simple:
- you tell us the therapy area, deliverable, timeline, and review environment
- we nominate a best-fit writer (and supporting roles if needed)
- we keep the project controlled through drafting and review so your team can move faster with fewer surprises
This sits behind our broader “network + project oversight” model
Tell us what you’re working on
If your programme is specialised, fast-moving, or under timeline pressure, include that in the form. We will come back with a recommended set-up and next steps.
NDA available immediately • No commitment
