‍Why Choosing the Right Journal Matters 

Submitting your research to the first relevant journal you come across might seem like an efficient way to work, but the right choice can make all the difference. A well-matched journal means more visibility, the most appropriate audience engaging with your work, and a boost to your professional credibility as well as to the subject of your research. On the flip side, submitting to a journal that isn’t the right fit can lead to delays, rejections, or your research reaching the wrong readers.

Journals vary widely in scope, audience, and impact, so it’s important to consider where your work will have the greatest influence. A high-impact journal might seem appealing, but if your research doesn’t align with its focus and publication priorities, your chances of acceptance drop significantly. Instead, targeting journals that match your research objectives ensures that your findings are seen, cited, and valued by the right community.

Taking the time to research journal requirements, audience demographics, and editorial expectations can set your manuscript up for success. Don’t underestimate the significance of proper journal choice. Not sure where to start? Check out our guide on Selecting a Journal for Publication for a step-by-step approach.

Understanding the Medical Publishing Landscape

Medical publishing has evolved beyond traditional subscription-based journals. Today, researchers have more options than ever, from open-access publishing to emerging trends like preprints and data-sharing platforms which provide faster publication options but lack peer review validation. With more choices come more questions—is open access publishing the best option, and how much does open access publishing cost?

Open-access publishing means that your research is freely available to anyone, increasing visibility and potential citations. Many researchers prefer this model, but it often comes with publication fees. Open-access journals are typically not free to publish in. Many charge article processing fees, though some institutions or funders may cover costs. The upside? No paywalls, making your work accessible to a broader audience. If budget allows, open access is often the best route to maximise the impact of your publication.

Then there’s the peer review process, a critical step in ensuring research quality. But when during the publication process does peer review occur? 

After submission but prior to acceptance and publication, expert reviewers evaluate your work, providing feedback and recommending revisions. Understanding how the peer review process works can help streamline the journey and increase your chances of acceptance. 

Types of peer review 

While traditional models remain widely used, peer review continues to evolve, with new approaches emerging to address various challenges. The most common types of peer review include single-anonymised, double-anonymised, and open peer review, while newer models, such as transparent, collaborative, and post-publication peer review, introduce key variations.

Traditional Peer Review Models

• Single-anonymised peer review: The reviewer's identity is hidden from the author, but the author's identity is known to the reviewer. The decision-making editor is aware of both identities.
• Double-anonymised peer review: Both the reviewer and author remain anonymous to each other, though the editor knows both identities. This model helps minimise bias by preventing reviewers from being influenced by an author’s reputation or institution.
• Triple-anonymised peer review: The most stringent form of anonymisation, where the reviewer, author, and editor do not have access to each other’s identities. This is less common due to the complexity of maintaining anonymity throughout the review process.
• Open peer review: The identities of both the reviewer and the author are fully disclosed. This model promotes transparency and accountability but may influence reviewer feedback due to concerns about potential conflicts or reputational risks.

Emerging Peer Review Models

• Transparent peer review: The review reports are published alongside the final article, allowing readers to assess the evaluation process. Reviewers may choose whether to disclose their identities.
• Collaborative peer review: Two variations exist:
  
  • Multiple reviewers work together to submit a unified report, offering a more comprehensive evaluation.
  • Authors engage in a structured revision process under the guidance of one or more reviewers, fostering a more constructive and iterative approach.
• Post-publication peer review: Review occurs after an article is published, either through invited or unsolicited reviews. This model allows for ongoing critique and discussion, complementing traditional pre-publication review processes.

What are the steps of the peer review process?

While the exact steps of the peer review process may vary between journals and review models, the standard workflow typically follows these key stages:

1. Submitting Your Manuscript
   You (or the corresponding author) submit your manuscript to your chosen journal, usually through an online system. Some journals may still accept email submissions, but online platforms are the norm. These platforms often vary in which information is required, and a MedComms agency can help by ensuring all the required information is collected prior to submission and also upload the submission on your behalf. 
2. Initial Checks by the Editorial Office
   Before your paper reaches an editor, the journal’s editorial office gives it a once-over to make sure it follows the formatting and submission guidelines. At this stage, they’re not assessing the quality of your research—just making sure everything is in order.
3. First Review by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC)
   The EIC takes a look at your manuscript to see if it fits the journal’s scope and meets its standards for originality and quality. If they feel it’s not the right fit, they may reject it outright at this stage.
4. Assigning an Associate Editor (AE)
   If the paper makes it past the EIC, it may be handed over to an Associate Editor (or handling editor) who will oversee the peer review process.
5. Finding Reviewers
   The handling editor contacts potential reviewers with expertise in your research area. Many journals also ask authors to suggest reviewers during submission, and some even make this mandatory. If initial invitations are declined, the editor continues reaching out until enough reviewers agree to take on the job.
6. Reviewers Accept (or Decline)
   Invited reviewers consider whether they have the time, expertise, and any conflicts of interest before accepting. If they can’t review, they might suggest alternative experts.
7. Reviewing the Manuscript
   Once they accept, reviewers read your paper, often multiple times. If they spot major flaws early on, they might recommend rejection without a full review. Otherwise, they write up detailed feedback, suggesting changes or improvements, and submit their recommendation—accept, revise, or reject.
8. Editorial Decision-Making
   The handling editor reviews all the feedback and decides what happens next. If reviewers strongly disagree, an additional reviewer may be invited to weigh in.
9. Hearing Back from the Journal
   You’ll receive an email with the editor’s decision, along with reviewer comments. If the journal uses single- or double-anonymous peer review, reviewer names will be hidden. In open or transparent peer review models, their identities may be shared.
10. What’s Next?‍
    
    1. If your paper is accepted, it moves on to production and publication.
    2. If you’re asked to revise, you’ll make the necessary changes and resubmit. Depending on the extent of revisions, reviewers may need to re-evaluate your paper.
    3. If your paper is rejected, you might decide to address the feedback and submit it elsewhere.

How long does the peer review process take?

It’s hard to give an exact timeline for how long the peer review process will take since there are so many factors that can influence the timeline. For a full research article, the review process usually takes anywhere from 1 to 6 months, but this can vary depending on the journal and how quickly reviewers and editors are able to complete their parts. Sometimes things can take a little longer if there are delays or if additional reviews are needed, but generally, you can expect at least a couple of months before you hear back.

Ultimately, choosing between journals that use traditional, open access, or newer models depends on your goals. If visibility and accessibility are key, open access may be worth the investment. And no matter the route, understanding the peer review process in journal publishing will help you navigate submission with confidence.

Assessing Journal Credibility

When selecting a journal for submission, it’s crucial to assess its credibility to ensure your research reaches the right audience. Reputable journals are characterised by rigorous peer review, clear editorial policies, and strong affiliations with academic institutions. In contrast, predatory journals often charge high fees without providing legitimate editorial oversight and may offer little-to-no peer review scrutiny. To effectively evaluate a journal’s reputation, consider factors such as its impact factor, indexing in major databases, and transparency in publication practices. 

Need more guidance? Check out our article on Identifying Predatory Journals. 

Understanding Journal Metrics

Journal metrics serve as key performance indicators for academic publications, helping researchers assess a journal’s influence and reach. Two of the most well-known metrics are the impact factor and CiteScore, both of which measure how frequently a journal’s articles are cited over a specific period. The h-index evaluates the productivity and citation impact of an author or journal, while SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper) accounts for differences in citation practices across disciplines. SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) goes a step further by considering both the number of citations and the prestige of the citing journals. 

Understanding these metrics can help you choose the best journal for your research and increase your work’s visibility. 

Curious about journal metrics? Check out What Are Journal Metrics? for a full breakdown of key indicators. If you’re interested in impact factors specifically, you can read What Is a Good Impact Factor? for more information.

Finding the Right Journal for Your Work

Choosing the right journal for your research is all about alignment—making sure your work fits the journal’s focus and reaches the right audience. Start by considering the journal’s scope, which defines the types of studies it publishes and its key subject areas. Next, think about the readership—are you aiming to reach specialists, clinicians, or a broader academic community? The journal’s therapeutic area or discipline is also crucial; submitting to a journal that regularly features similar research increases your chances of acceptance. Finally, review the journal’s submission guidelines to ensure your manuscript meets formatting and content expectations. For a step-by-step approach to this process, check out Selecting a Journal for Publication. Need help finding top journals in your field? Explore our Top 10 Journals Home Page for a curated list.

Planning for Submission Success

A well-prepared manuscript can make all the difference in a journal submission. To increase your chances of acceptance, start by following the journal submission guidelines of your chosen publication. Most journals have specific formatting requirements, including citation styles such as ICMJE, AMA, or APA. If you’re wondering how to submit a manuscript to a journal, it’s crucial to carefully review the journal’s submission portal and guidelines.

Essential Steps for a Successful Submission

1. Proofreading and Editing – A polished manuscript free of grammatical errors and inconsistencies reflects professionalism. Consider professional editing services for clarity and precision.
2. Pre-Submission Inquiries – If unsure about a journal’s interest in your work, reach out to the editor before submitting a manuscript to confirm fit.
3. Ethical Considerations – Ensure proper authorship credit, disclose conflicts of interest, and follow ethical research practices.
4. Effective Cover Letters – Your cover letter for journal submission introduces your research and highlights its significance. If you’re wondering how to write a cover letter for a journal submission, focus on clarity, conciseness, and alignment with the journal’s scope.

Mastering the Cover Letter for a Journal Submission

Before you write your cover letter, check the Instructions for Authors page of your chosen journal; not all journals require a cover letter. This page will also tell you what you need to include in your cover letter. As a general guide, a strong cover letter journal submission should include:

• The editor's name. You can usually find this on the journal's website.
• A brief introduction to your research.
• A statement on why your study fits the journal’s scope.
• Any conflicts of interest or ethical disclosures.
• A professional closing with author details.
• Contact information for you and any co-authors. 

Managing Your Timeline

If you’re wondering how to submit a manuscript for publication, planning ahead is key. From preparing the first draft to final submission, allocate time for revisions, formatting, and approvals from co-authors. Each journal has its own timeline for peer review and publication, so be sure to check their estimated processing time but also take into account that the time needed for peer review can vary considerably from the estimation.

Don’t Miss a Step!

To streamline your submission, read our article Preparing a Research Manuscript for Submission—a must-have resource to ensure your manuscript meets all requirements before hitting submit. Need extra support? Explore our expert editing and submission services to enhance your chances of success.

Avoiding Common Reasons for Rejection

Nothing stings quite like getting a rejection after all the time and effort you put into your manuscript. But the good news? Many rejections happen for predictable reasons, and they’re avoidable. Some of the biggest culprits include mismatched journal scope, unclear writing, and ethical concerns such as undisclosed conflicts of interest. Even strong research can be turned down if it doesn’t follow the journal’s guidelines or lacks a compelling structure. Want to improve your chances of acceptance? Check out Common Reasons for Rejection and How to Avoid Them for practical tips on steering clear of these pitfalls.

Following Up After Submission

The journal submission process requires patience, but if you haven’t heard back within the journal’s stated review timeline—usually 6 to 12 weeks—it’s reasonable to send a polite follow-up email inquiring about the status of your manuscript. If you receive reviewer comments or a ‘revise and resubmit’ request, approach them thoughtfully. Address each point carefully, provide a clear response letter, and make necessary revisions while maintaining your research’s integrity. If a comment seems unfair or unclear, politely explain your reasoning for not being able to fully address it rather than dismissing it outright. Resubmitting a revised manuscript promptly, while ensuring all feedback is properly addressed, will improve your chances of acceptance.

Handling Rejection with Confidence

Rejection is a normal part of the publication process—even experienced researchers face it. Journals receive far more submissions than they can publish, making rejection a common outcome. The key is knowing how to respond productively.

There are two main types of rejection: technical rejections and peer-reviewed rejections. Technical rejections occur before peer review and are usually due to issues such as improper formatting, failure to meet submission guidelines, ethical concerns, or a mismatch between the manuscript’s focus and the journal’s scope. These are often the easiest to address by carefully reviewing the journal’s requirements and making the necessary adjustments before resubmitting.

Peer-reviewed rejections occur after the manuscript has been evaluated by experts in the field. In these cases, reviewers provide feedback but do not recommend acceptance in its current form. The feedback can range from minor concerns that might be addressed in a revision to fundamental issues with the study’s methodology, significance, or originality.

If your manuscript is rejected, don’t be discouraged. Rejections are not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work—many groundbreaking studies were initially turned down before finding the right home. The first step is to carefully review the editor’s comments and peer reviewers' feedback to understand the reasons for the decision. If the feedback suggests that revisions could improve the manuscript, you may have the option to revise and resubmit to the same journal. However, if the rejection is firm or the journal does not allow resubmissions, it may be better to target a different journal that aligns better with your research but also take the feedback on board.

Seeking input from colleagues or a MedComms agency can provide valuable perspectives on how to improve the manuscript and where to submit next. In some cases, a fresh set of eyes can help you refine your arguments, improve clarity, or address gaps that might have led to rejection.

For more detailed guidance on how to handle feedback and strengthen your submission, check out What to do When your Manuscript is Rejected.

Conclusion

Successfully navigating the journal submission process requires careful planning, strategic decision-making, and persistence. From selecting the right journal to preparing a strong manuscript and responding to reviewer feedback, each step plays a crucial role in maximising your chances of publication. While the process can be complex and sometimes discouraging, understanding journal requirements, avoiding common pitfalls, and seeking expert guidance can make a significant difference. Whether your goal is visibility, credibility, or impact, taking a thoughtful and informed approach will help ensure your research reaches the right audience. Stay patient, stay persistent, and keep refining your work—every submission brings you one step closer to publication.

Ready to Publish? Partner with Experts Who Can Guide You

Navigating the publication process can be challenging, but you don’t have to do it alone. Our experts at Rx Communications provide professional medical writing and editing, journal selection support, and submission guidance and management to help you get your research published with confidence.

Let us help you refine your manuscript, respond to reviewer feedback, and maximise your chances of acceptance.

Partner with Rx today and take the next step toward publication!